Skip to content

Grounded in a curated research library — not just a chatbot

Find the assignment.
Or have it written.

Search thousands of academic papers and model answers. If we already have your topic, read a free preview and unlock the full paper. If we don't, our AI writes it — grounded in our knowledge base, not invented from thin air.

Try: CRISPR gene editing behavioural economics nudge transformer machine translation attachment theory

Create a free account and get 2,000 tokens to start — no card required.

Papers
13
Subjects
8
Free tokens
2,000

Browse by subject

Every discipline, from first year through doctoral research.

View everything →

Computer Science

2 papers

Business & Management

2 papers

Psychology

2 papers

Biology & Medicine

2 papers

Economics

2 papers

Law & Politics

1 paper

Engineering

1 paper

Literature & History

1 paper

How it works

Three steps, and you only pay for what you actually use.

  1. 1

    Search any topic

    Type your assignment topic. We search titles, abstracts, keywords and full text across the whole library.

  2. 2

    Preview before you pay

    Every result shows a genuine free preview — the abstract and opening. You know exactly what you're getting before a single token is spent.

  3. 3

    Unlock or generate

    Spend 1,200 tokens to unlock an existing paper, or have Claude write a new one grounded in our knowledge base. Failed generations are always refunded.

Featured papers

Browse the library →
Economics Undergraduate

Behavioural Economics and the Limits of Nudge Policy

Nudge policy promised large welfare gains from small, cheap interventions. A decade of replication work has narrowed that promise considerably. This essay reviews the evidence on default effects, framing and salience interventions, and argues that nudges work best precisely where they matter least — and that the political appeal of nudging lies in its avoidance of distributive conflict.

708 words 3 min read 1,200 tokens to unlock
Computer Science Master's

Ethical Frameworks for Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Services

When a public body delegates a decision to an algorithm, it does not thereby escape the obligation to justify that decision. This paper examines three competing frameworks for algorithmic accountability — procedural, outcome-based and contestability-centred — and argues that only the third adequately preserves the administrative-law principle that affected parties can demand reasons.

703 words 3 min read 1,200 tokens to unlock
Computer Science Master's

The Impact of Transformer Architectures on Machine Translation

Transformer architectures displaced recurrent models as the dominant paradigm in neural machine translation within three years of their introduction. This paper traces that displacement, arguing that the decisive advantage was not raw accuracy but parallelisability during training, which converted translation quality into a problem of available compute. It evaluates the empirical record across high- and low-resource language pairs and considers where the architecture's assumptions still break down.

724 words 3 min read 1,200 tokens to unlock

Simple token pricing

Buy tokens once, spend them on whatever you need. They never expire.

Starter

$9.00

5,000 tokens

Try it out on a single assignment.

Most popular

Semester

$29.00

23,000 tokens

The one most students pick.

Scholar

$79.00

75,000 tokens

For dissertation season.

See all packages